Jan W. van Deth and Sonja Zmerli (Eds.)  
 

Civicness, Equality, and Democracy—A "Dark Side" of Social Capital

   
   
  Special Issue of the American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5)  
     
  Sage: Thousand Oaks. 2010  
  ISSN:  

Go to

Table of Contents

 

 

Abstract :

Debates about social capital usually focus on its presumed positive consequences. Although this expectation has been corroborated empirically, in many instances some less benign consequences of social capital have also been uncovered. Several explanations for the emergence and consequences of these "dark sides" of social capital are briefly presented here and, subsequently, put to empirical testing. The contributors to this issue of American Behavioral Scientist have a common understanding of these dark sides of social capital. Conceptualizing them as negative consequences or outcomes, the authors use various research strategies to scrutinize the nature of the effects of social capital in various situations. In each analysis, however, particular focus is placed on the importance of the contextual setting. Special attention is paid to the degree of democratization, the postcommunist legacy, different welfare state regimes, the saliency of political cleavages, and types and interconnectedness of voluntary associations. The findings suggest that the specific consequences of social capital largely depend on political and social conditions.

Contents:

 

Jan W. van Deth and Sonja Zmerli
Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy—A "Dark Side" of Social Capital?
631-639

 

Jan W. van Deth

640-656

 

Sonja Zmerli

657-676

 

Roberto Albano and Filippo Barbera
Social Capital, Welfare State, and Political Legitimacy
677-690

 

Gema M. García Albacete

691-716

 

Hajdeja Iglic

717-736

 

Sigrid Roßteutscher

737-757

 

Monika Ewa Kaminska

758-777