Frank Schimmelfennig |
|||
| The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe | |||
| Rules and Rhetoric |
 |
||
| 323 pages, Cambridge, University Press, 2003 | |||
| ISBN 0-521-53525-5 | |||
|
Go to |
Abstract
Frank Schimmelfennig analyzes the Eastern enlargement of the European Union and NATO and develops the theoretical approach of "rhetorical action" to explain why it occurred. The analysis shows that rationalist institutionalism accounts for the material member state preferences but cannot explain why the EU and NATO eventually decided to admit the Central and Eastern European countries. By contrast, sociological institutionalism explains this decision as the expansion of the Western international community to countries that have come to share its liberal norms but does not account for how this rule-based outcome was possible among self-interested states and against a powerful coalition of member states. Frank Schimmelfennig attributes this outcome to rhetorical action and the constraints of the community environment in which the member states acted. The candidates and their supporters among the member states successfully used arguments based on the collective identity, values, norms, and practice of the Western community to shame the opponents into acquiescing in enlargement.
Contents
| Introduction | ||
| Part 1 | Security, power or welfare? Eastern enlargement in a rationalist perspective | |
| Rationalist institutionalism and the enlargement of regional organizations | ||
| NATO enlargement | ||
| EU enlargement | ||
| Conclusion: the rationalist puzzle of Eastern enlargement | ||
| Part 2 | Expanding the Western community of liberal values and norms: Eastern enlargement in a sociological perspective | |
| Sociological institutionalism and the enlargement of regional organizations | ||
| Eastern enlargement and the Western international community | ||
| The event history of enlargement | ||
| Conclusion: the sociological solution to the enlargement puzzle | ||
| Part 3 | Association instead of membership: preferences and bargaining power in Eastern enlargement | |
| Process hypotheses | ||
| State preferences and the initial enlargement process | ||
| Conclusion: the double puzzle of Eastern enlargement | ||
| Part 4 | From association to membership: rhetorical action in Eastern enlargement | |
| Rhetorical action | ||
| The decision to enlarge NATO | ||
| The decision to enlarge the EU | ||
| Conclusion: solving the double puzzle of Eastern enlargement | ||
| Strategic action in international community: concluding remarks | ||
Frank Schimmelfennig is a Fellow of the Mannheim Center for European Social Research, Germany. He has recently been a Jean Monnet Fellow at the Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies of the European University Institute (Florence) and a NATO Research Fellow. He has taught International Relations and European Politics at the Universities of Darmstadt, Düsseldorf, Konstanz, Mannheim and Tübingen. He has published on European international politics in, among others, Comparative Political Studies, European Journal of International Relations, International Organization, Journal of Common Market Studies, and Journal of European Public Policy.