Needs and Debates. The Moderating Impact of "Need to Evaluate" and "Need for Cognition" on Perceptions and Effects of Televised Debates | Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung

Jürgen Maier, Thorsten Faas
Needs and Debates. The Moderating Impact of "Need to Evaluate" and "Need for Cognition" on Perceptions and Effects of Televised Debates

33rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology (ISPP), San Francisco, CA, July 07th to July 10th, 2011

More publications of this research area

Jan Eric Blumenstiel

Can open-ended questions help to identify voter heterogeneity?

Mona Krewel, Julia Partheymüller

Rethinking the Level of Analysis – A Call for Shifting the Perspective of Campaign Effects Research to Multi-Level Analysis

Jan Eric Blumenstiel, Tobias Gummer

Long-Term Panels of the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES). Concept and Implementation

Visiting address

Mannheimer Zentrum für
Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES)
A5, 6 (section A)
68159 Mannheim

Phone +49-621-181-2868
Fax +49-621-181-2866
direktorat [at] mzes.uni-mannheim.de

Postal address

Universität Mannheim, MZES
68131 Mannheim, Germany

Jürgen Maier, Thorsten Faas
Needs and Debates. The Moderating Impact of "Need to Evaluate" and "Need for Cognition" on Perceptions and Effects of Televised Debates

Visiting address

Postal address

News

The MZES

Projects

Publications

People

Jürgen Maier, Thorsten FaasNeeds and Debates. The Moderating Impact of "Need to Evaluate" and "Need for Cognition" on Perceptions and Effects of Televised Debates

MZES-Project

Jürgen Maier, Thorsten Faas
Needs and Debates. The Moderating Impact of "Need to Evaluate" and "Need for Cognition" on Perceptions and Effects of Televised Debates