Security Threats and Fragile Commitments: Stress-Testing Public Support for Human Rights at Home and Abroad
Research question/goal:
This project examines whether and under what conditions support for human rights can be strengthened during times of crisis. Drawing on a series of innovative survey experiments conducted with the German adult population, we assess both theoretically and empirically whether emphasising the significance of human rights increases public support. We investigate how characteristics of the rights holder and individuals’ predispositions towards human rights shape the impact of different arguments in crisis situations. By testing the malleability of attitudes towards different rights under different scenarios using different arguments in support for human rights, we generate new insights on which rights are seen as more or less contestable by different societal groups and individuals. Through a combination of survey and experimental methods, we map human rights attitudes among the German population, test the fragility of these commitments when their universality and unconditionality are contested, and assess whether normative or instrumental arguments can bolster citizens' defence of their basic human rights.
This is a joint project with Katrin Paula (Technische Universität München), Robert Johns (University of Southampton) and Nadine O’Shea (Technische Universität München).
Current stage:
We are currently finalising our paper on whether different arguments can strengthen support for human rights by protecting the right to demonstrate without fear of excessive police violence. We find that pro–human rights arguments do not generally sway people’s opinion. However, they lower support for rights-restricting policies in the least likely circumstances, for example when such policies target an out-group and when people have strong anti–human rights priors. We are about to roll out the second wave of our survey among 8,000 respondents in Germany to investigate how deliberation about the right to protest influences people’s opinion, using different forms of media to convey the deliberation to respondents.